Americans
were Instrumental in Shaping much of the Mestizo Violence of Mexico, though
that's not to say it had not been a Long and Sordid History of Violence before
America ever Existed.
Its Creel Family is Descended from a Union Ambassador. A Member of a Unionist Branch of The Bowie Family was a "Colonel" (#2 Bandit) in one of the many Zapatista-Associated Revolutions, and that got Intertwined with Creel.
Its Creel Family is Descended from a Union Ambassador. A Member of a Unionist Branch of The Bowie Family was a "Colonel" (#2 Bandit) in one of the many Zapatista-Associated Revolutions, and that got Intertwined with Creel.
Though this Ancestor
was without such Political Connections, Former Mexican President Vicente Fox
(Previously, "Fuchs") is Descended in Part from a German American
from Cincinnati.
Although he is also of
Partial Basque Descent, he is not the European he is often Alledged to be; his
Paternal Grandmother, often Neglected in Biographies, was a Mestiza.
Today, many
"Aryan Brotherhood" Types, even when not Mestizos, Themselves, are
Miscegenating with Mestizos and/or Protecting Mestizo Cartel Shipments Into
America.
But let's go back to
the Well-Connected, Historical Personas:
Creel-Bowie Bred
together with a Daughter of Luis Terrazas, who was from Mexico and - like Creel
was doing - would Profit off of not only Government Contracts but Financing
Revolutions to Expand that Income. Terrazas even would Use his Position as
Governor of Chihuahua to Move Armies in and out of Areas he Intended to Purchase
or Sell to Reduce or Augment Prices in his Favour. Terrazas was a Political
Ally and Confidant of Benito Juarez, even Hosting him at his Hacienda.
Two Examples of
Terrazas' Wealth are that when someone from Swift (the American Meat Packer)
asked if he could Supply 100 Head of Cattle, he Replied "In what
color?", and that he also Owned so much of its Land (not to Mention that
he Owned its Railroad) that when someone asked him at a Social Function if he
were from Chihuahua, he Replied "I am not from Chihuahua, Chihuahua is
mine."
Enrique Creel and
Mexican Victoriano Huerta were Arrested for Purchasing $895,000 in Arms from
Germany, while in America with other Mexicans and Indoctrinated Whites. Thus,
the former two were Arrested for Violating U.S. Neutrality. Ironically, America
had been Illegally Arming The U.K. through Civilian Vessels that it would Deny
were Bearing Weapons until after WWI. So, Germany - having an Interest in
Recruiting Mexico to its Side - would Sell Weapons to these same Socialists and
Communists that America was no Stranger to Conducting Business with. Both would
Escape, though Pascual Orozco (who, though of Basque Descent, and the Wealthy
Owner of a Gold Mine, had Adopted the Marxist Cause of The Mazatec Magón
Brothers) would not be so Fortunate.
These Banditos were
once Allies of Pancho Villa, and he even Starred in at least one Hollywood
Movie that Glamorized his Banditry. Bear In Mind this was AFTER he was
Unsuccessfully Chased Across The Desert by The U.S. Army. He ended up being
Killed by other Revolutionaries. They Frequently Switched Sides. It was the
same Year that Luis Terrazas would Die of Old Age. This is Significant because
he Split with Villa, having Accused him of Rustling Cattle, and Villa's
Response was to Kidnap Luis's Son.
The only thing Positive that I have to say about Terrazas, not Extending from such a Personal Grievance as the above, is that Teddy Roosevelt had Convinced him to Purchase Land for Boer Refugees from The Anglo-Boer War. Boer, at the time, were Popular in America; there were even Board Games (of such a Variety as "Risk") that Glorified them, and Toy Soldiers and Calvary of Boer Guerrillas. While it Initially Thrived, the Colony later Dissipated; many would Emigrate (Legally) to America, and some even became Important Figures in such Major Events as The Louisiana Purchase. Unfortunately, I still have Mostly-Negative things to say about Teddy Roosevelt.
America liked Porfirio
Diaz, as a "Capitalist", which basically meant he Supported what
today is called "N.A.F.T.A." It liked Plutarco Elias Calles, a
Jew-Mestizo and Masonic Communist, for a Combination of the same Motive and
that he was Violently Suppressing Catholicism.
Notice that even Adam
Smith, the so-called Founder of Capitalism (who never Used that Term - as it
was Coined by Rabbi Moses Mordecai Levy a.k.a. Karl Heinrich Marx), had 18
Conditions (Conveniently Neglected by Capitalism's Aforementioned True Founder)
for which Government may Intervene in Otherwise-Private Affairs.
Upon such Grounds, many
would later Lambaste Henry Ford Sr. as a "Socialist". He was neither
a Capitalist nor a Communist, thus, as Marx was really Describing
Libertarianism (Formalized by more Jews, like Hans Kelsen), though Offering a
Non-Solution, but he had Comparable Differences with many all would Label a
"Socialist".
While The
"N.S.D.A.P." was a Grab-Bag of Dissidents, and he was only Elected
its Leader as a Compromise by a Party-Bloc that was under both Internal (both
in the Sense of the Party Bloc and The Wiemar Republic) and External Pressures
(again, both from The Wiemar Republic and Outside Germany), this is why Hitler
was so often Opposed by others also Labeled Socialists yet - though not a
Communist - he spoke of Plundering by Capitalists.
Being as its Literal
Meanings are merely "Social Belief" or "Social Practice",
any Negative Sense of "Socialism" should be Defined as Follows: Any
Atraditional Fusion (as Relates to European Civilization) of Government and
another Sector; Particularly, in a Detrimental Manner.
