Monday, July 18, 2016

Greenland: Our Fertile Reemergence in a Land of Ice

Every now and then, I like to Suggest that We Conquer Greenland.  And whenever I do, everyone likes to Complain to me about how Cold it is and that there's nothing to do. Aren't you the same People who use "Desert" as a Pejorative (never Mind how much of Our History is in those Deserts, apparently) and Post Incessantly about "Going Off The Grid"?  I guess you want to be Off The Grid in a Temperate Environment.  Let me know how that works out for you, since you're also the ones who always say "Remember Ruby Ridge?" and "Remember Waco?" whenever someone Suggests an Enclave of any Sort in such a Region (never Mind all the Enclaves that are Thriving, as those are in other Climates, like Orania or the ones in South America).  But I think I have a few Statistics and Concepts that will Interest you:

Greenland is The Least Dense Country On Earth, and There Are No Inter-Settlement Roads. Greenland Is 65 Times Less Dense Than Mongolia, and that's even Despite that 4/5ths Live just in The Southwest. Telecommunications are Monopolized by one Company. This is a Tactician's Wet Dream.

Monopolies are Common in Greenland, and there are still Villages that have No Modern Pluming. Do I Smell A Reform Party Ticket? Yes, I Do. And It Smells Like Victory.

Greenland has BY FAR The World's Highest Suicide Rate. It is Exponentially Greater than any other Country, with 107 Per 1,000. In Other Words: They'll Help Us Kill Them, When They Realize Resistance Is Futile. Best Yet, Some Will Volunteer For Our Side.

While you might at first be Alarmed by all the Night Lights in these Villages, Rest Assured; it's only because Greenlanders are Highly Superstitious. They Believe not only in Ghosts (Southrons, We Know Where I'm Going With This, Yes?) but in Entities called Qivitoq, which some say are Banished Men who have been Driven Mad by the Elements, who Hunt for Survival and have Acquired a Beast-Like Strength. Unsolved Murders are Attributed to Qivitoq, and many Villagers say there are Footprints in the Snow where no one in the Family has Walked.

Greenland has a Higher Per Capita Murder Rate than anywhere in the World but Africa and Latin America. Bodies in the Snow are Nothing New. There are many Locations where Skeletons can be found in the Ice, along Hiking Trails. Our Activities will go Unnoticed.

After Reconquest, what a Location for a Budding Film Industry!

What a Location for Desalination Facilities, and what Potential for Hydro-Electric, Wind (Onshore and Offshore) and Solar Power! Oil is already Drilled for, and the Purest of Water from Glassier is already Bottled there. Rare Resources are Concealed under that Ice. "Oh, Russia! Exclusive Rights, In Exchange For Protection." Now, of course, We'll have to Ensure those are actually Russians, Volga Germans or other Europeans which We are Receiving. Apart from the Visually-Obvious, We can always Finance Genetic Testing by deCODE through these Lucrative Businesses.

Go Ahead, Have Your Enclave; as long as it Appears Innocuous from the Outside, the Internal Proceedings won't have anyone Bothering you. Even if We are The Laziest Re-Conquistador Generation Yet, We could have Decent Lives just in Our Villages.  What a Glorious Age of Technology this is, where even a Remote, Primitively-Constructed Village can have Wi-Fi. 

Our Ancestors did it without WiFi or anywhere near such Knowledge as has been made Available to Us, and they didn't even have Firearms, Snowmobiles, Snowplows, Motorboats, Airplanes and Over 1,000 Years of History to Build on for the Rapid Expansion of a New Political Party.  

Think about it: "Qivitoq" Attack and a Documentary Crew goes out to Investigate.  They become so Enamored with it, they Settle.  They Form a new Militia for the Protection of these Villages, and become Increasingly Vocal about an Avaricious Regime that Lacks Compassion for either Inuit or Danish.  No one will Suspect these People are Allied with the ones Killing the Inuit, Miscegenators and any other Deviants.  After all, they were Present when there were Attacks.  Maybe, We even Recruit some Expendable Student Filmmaker who Provides the Necessary Equipment and the Martyrdom when he or she becomes a Victim of a "Qivitoc" Attack.  Ideally, the Terror will be Captured on Film... but nothing Revealing about the Perpetrator(s).  We could Dress in Hides and Adorn Our Heads with those of Wolves or Reindeer.  Antler-Mutilated Bodies would Help to Sell The Legend, as would Entrails up in Trees or Half-Devoured Animals sticking just enough out of the Snow or from between Rocks to be Discovered.  It is a Simple Effect to Fabricate, to make it Appear that Victims have been Cannibalized.  If someone is not Squeamish about those he Culls or which are Necessary Sacrifices, he can so Disfigure his Victims so it Appears that They were still Alive when he Ate Them.  It will not be Difficult to Frame an Inuit for this, since They are the Actual Inspiration for the Legend.  

Besides, They Attacked Vikings who were The First Nations' Peoples of Southeast Greenland.  This Presents Another Possibility.  However Deranged this "Qivitoc" are to be Portrayed, We could Dispense with the Cannibalistic Imagery that I would otherwise find quite Compelling and Insist - if We are Captured - that We are Leifurs.  That is, Leifur's.  Leifur Eiriksson's.  We will Refer to Inuit as Skrælingi (Plural: Skrælingjar), but have Better either Learn Ancient Icelandic, Old Norse or at least Danish (Preferably, Utilizing not merely more Archaic Words but the Proper Pronunciations of these) or a Combination thereof.  We could always Claim to have Sheltered the Lost and Runaways, to both Add a Romantic Element to Our Culture (which should see itself as in a Holy Racial War, as Vikings had by then Converted to Christianity) and Explain how We would Know any Danish, English or other Languages that We would have Learned from Stranded Hikers who Found Appear in Our Cult.  We would, of course, Develop Our Own Blend and New Words from Combinations of these and Along the Rules of these Different European Languages, and Concentrate on Concealing Our Accent so it is Convincing to even The Best-Trained Linguists that Ours is a Language some 1,000 Years In The Making.   

I don't see why We can't do both.  But, of course, I am as Romantic as Pragmatic.  Perhaps you want to go back to more Traditional Forms of Guerrilla Warfare, as Ironic as that Sounds.  Suit yourself.  Either way, I'll have my Pack of Greenlandic Dogs and some of those Howls in the Moonlight will be me Fostering Legends.  Also, "Greenlandic Dogs" would make an Excellent Name for a Motorcycle Gang... once We have more Roads.  


They Are Begging Us To Conquer Them.  Let's Not Disappoint.  

Friday, July 1, 2016

On Inroads

More and more Politicians are Joining the Long-Awaited Campaign of Elitist Consolidation, and those Promoted as "Rouges" may finally not all be the Jews that the likes of Glenn Beck were Endorsing but are still either just Reducing the Rate at which Alienisms are Promoted or Altering which Lunacies are Dogmatic.  They aren't Nationalists, and those Employing this Label are often Eager for another Fratricide simply because this European or that European falls on a Different Side of a Line that probably only Exists on Arbitrary Grounds and perhaps has long been Disputed by those who think "It's a National Shame" for European A to give the time of day to European B.  Then, European C has Emigrated from Europe and his new Country thinks it either has to have no Loyalties to anyone in Europe or Binds itself Specifically to those Regimes most Disastrous to Our Peoples and Ways of Life.  But here are some Proposals for how to Undermine Their System, apart from the Methodologies of Guerrilla Warfare and Unconventional Symbolic Warfare which I have already Discussed:


Teach People about All White Cultures, and Jewry's Culture Wars.  Not just the Obvious ones, like German, Spanish or Russian, but the many Ethno-Cultures thereof.  While talking about Irish, talk also about Irish Travelers or the Irish in America and the ones once in The Caribbean.  If talking about Scots, talk about how - before "Reconstruction" and "Multiculturalism" - these were your "Rednecks" and "Hillbillies"; these were your Highlanders and others Seeking Independence, or their Descendants in Appalachia.  In Western Europe?  Suck it up and Learn about Slavic, Hellenic (this one shouldn't Bother you, even more so, if you aren't being even more Hypocritical than with the others), Latin (this one shouldn't Bother you either, for the aforesaid Reasons and that these are - Literally and Figuratively - Closer To Home) and Baltic Peoples and their Cultures, all their many Crosses and Subgroups and those with other European Peoples.  In Eastern Europe?  Suck it up and Learn about the Germanic (Including but not Limited to Volga Germanic and Baltic Germanic), Non-Baltic Scandinavian (not Limited to those who Resided in Eastern Europe, either, whether to be Absorbed, to Relocate or to Remain a Distinct Ethnicity), Gaelic, Gaulish and other Celtic and/or Baskid (and not just the ones who Resided in Eastern Europe), Latin (and not just those who were Absorbed into Eastern European Populations called Aromanians or Vlachs), and Hispanic Peoples, the many Crosses thereof and all their many Subgroups.  In Northern Europe?  Suck it up and Learn about those Hispanic, Latin and Hellenic Peoples, and all their many Crosses and Subgroups, and how these Crossed with Gaulish, Visigothic, Alanic, Thracian, Slavic or other European Peoples to Form new Subgroups and Cultures.  In Southern Europe?  Suck it up and Learn about the Celto-Baskid, Scandinavian, Germanic, Baltic and Slavic Peoples who didn't come to Reside there, and their many Crosses and Subgroups.  Anywhere in Europe, suck it up and Learn about everywhere in Europe and how Our Influence has been Exported Globally.  You might actually Enjoy it, if you Apply what you Learn to Redeeming Practice, you thus-far-Uncultured Disgraces to Our Ancestors.  


But how to Foster a World that will not Devour Us for doing so?  


Develop Inroads with other Dissidents of a Milder Form of those Views that We would not otherwise get a Word in Edgewise with, such as those only Flirting with Libertarianism because nothing else is Offered that's not (as far as these Realize) more of the same Crap that's been Screwing everyone thus far or are Students who are Rebelling and/or want something "Cool".  Argue that We have a Right to Self-Determination, and that Financial Sovereignty is a Portion of this that is Controlled for the same Motives as what should be Our Media; to Finance that which Suits Their Agenda, and Suppress or Destroy that which is Critical of Their Globalist Aspirations and may otherwise be Able to Liberate Our People from Them.  Individualism, after all, is to be Encouraged so long as it is Tempered by Objectivity.  Our Race Exists, and Our Race Deserves To Exist.  You are not so Important that you are Allowed to Reject that Premise, but those who Accept it will Rise or Fall in Position by Merit within Our Civilization.  

"High Liberals", who Listen to, Perform or maybe even Compose Classical Music, Genuine European Folk Music or even something Avant Garde, as long as it has at least some Grounding in such as I am Describing, Read or even Write Literature or Poetry of a Classical Variety or of such Quality but about Contemporary Issues or Our Future (whether Fears, Aspirations or some of each), Admire or even Create Art of a Classical or other Productive Variety, are Urban Explorers, Photographic or Literary Journalists of Remnants of Bygone Eras of Value (either Fundamentally or as Critiques of a Regime that We also Take Issue with; Preferably, when Rationales are already at least somewhat Aligned) or Isolated European Communities (in both Joy and Suffering, so long as the former isn't Vilified - much less even Demonized - and the latter isn't Exalted; rather, Ideally, when the Photographs are Accompanied with Our Sympathies), Cinema Buffs, Aspiring Actors or Actresses, Screenwriters or Indie Directors, Automotive Enthusiasts, Fashionistas of a more Traditional Sense (at least in Regards to Modest Character, if not Specific Forms), those Interested in the Exploration and Colonization of Outer Space, Subterranean Caverns or Aquatic Depths, Linguists, Anthropologists, Archaeologists, Paleontologists or other Historians and Scientists, Medical Doctors, Big Game Fishers and Hunters who still Believe in the Code of "Eat What You Kill" or Trade with those who Prefer that Diet, Adventurers, Agrarians, Ranchers, Old World Craftsmen, Innovators of the Practical and Astronomical that may one day see many more Practicalities, and otherwise are Connoisseurs of European Culture, and perhaps even do so for the Sake of these Concepts (instead of simply because of an Uninformed Response of "It's what's expected", "It's Popular" or "I'm Rebelling", as Expectations and Popularity - for Better or Worse - may Change), are another and perhaps even Better Option for those with whom to Develop Inroads.  

Liberals in America who Adopt White Children, as well, Regardless of whether or not of the aforesaid Affiliation, as long as Preferable to the Current Plight of these Oppressed Peoples, should be told to Adopt White South Africans.  Where the Orphanages still have not been Reformed enough, if at all, since Soviet Occupation['s sometimes more Nominal End, sometimes (and Recently) Particularly Under The E.U.], the Indigenous Peoples [or those of that Race but another (at least Recent) Territorial Affiliation] should Adopt those Children and Demand Reforms.  Where Adopting Whites from elsewhere will Tip The Scales in Our Demographic Favour, these Places should Adopt White Africans.  If you wish to Sponsor Citizenship, do it for Whites.  First and Foremost, Sponsor Citizenship For White South Africans and those Fleeing "Euro-Maiden's" Assault On Donbass.  

Liberals that are Worried about Overpopulation should be Convinced to Direct Their Efforts Against The Non-White World. Some may even have the Understanding and Emotional Stability to Admit that Whites are Dangerously - But Not Irreparably - Underpopulated, and may only have a Transient Presence in Liberal Politics; another Party that Offers everything Worthwhile these can get out of Liberalism, Especially the Less it is Offered there, Particular the more Antagonistic the Liberal Leaders and/or Mainstream are to it, at least if We Provide the Explanations [and, at least as much as this, if not more than this, We have to Provide the Compassion that Virtually Us All have been (Truly, and Frequently, Deliberately) Deprived of] that these have not yet Received as to why certain Liberal Policies are Destructive, may Convert these Altogether.


Vote For White Candidates Over Non-White Candidates, Regardless of Political Profession.  Vote For Isolationists Over Alienist Globalists.  Vote For Socially-Conservative Socialists Over Socially-Alienist Fiscal Conservatives (the latter would be the likes of Libertarians and Rinos, which can even be Left of Blue Dogs).  Vote For "Palestinianists" Over "Zionists", if you must Vote for one (at least to Block the other, even if They are otherwise Identical).  That way, Immature Whites will not be (so Frequently, anyway) Deceived into Believing that "We Must Rely On Them", but We will also Remember that Some Whites Are Race-Traitors.  Furthermore, some Candidates will Pull A Trump (Coined It!) and go from Hostile to such Views to at least somewhat Sympathetic about them (in Appearance, anyway, which will Provoke Mass Anger if We are Betrayed yet again) for at least Political Expediency.  You may, then, Vote for these.  If someone Genuinely European Nationalist is Available, at any Point, this is Our Candidate.  If not, The Closer The Better.

As this Applies to many if not all of the aforesaid, or would if someone Suggested it to them, at least if it were Widespread and/or Portrayed as "Edgy", "Provocative", "Bold" and other Words that Liberals like to use (even if usually to Described things not all that Healthy), Seek Out the Pro-Abortion Democrats who have a History of Restricting Abortion Clinics to Non-White Districts and/or Donating in what would otherwise Appear to be an Ironic Fashion to Pro-Life Movements (at least, and Especially, if these are at least as - and Preferably More; Ideally, Exclusively - Active in White Areas).

Meanwhile, Continue to do the same with Anti-Abortion Republicans who have a Favourable Record about not only Gun Rights and The Death Penalty but about Racial Preferences.  You won't get anywhere with the Neo-Cons that are Adopting even more Negros than Liberals are, nor those that have made Refusing to Abort a Down's Syndrome-Afflicted Fetus into a Status Symbol. Meanwhile, some might have an Unclear Stance on Abortion or be for it under such Conditions as Rape, Incest or when certain Congenital Defects are Present.  Additionally, some Democrats will Support a Death Penalty and/or Gun Rights.  Look for those Promoting one Cause in Non-White Areas and the other in White ones, and see which are Friends and which are Enemies. The Average Person would Agree that the Improvements in Science and Investigative Techniques many Experts are Suggesting that are Underused should be Implemented as Well-Practiced Standards, which would Reduce both the Number of Wrongfully Accused, the Number of Wrongfully Released and the Number of those Opposed to The Death Penalty.


Allow Leftists Secession; it's perhaps More-Effective than Seceding Ourselves, though this may Facilitate it, as The Regime will either be Fighting Them instead of Us (or, at least, Distracted in said Fight by the aforesaid Infighting of Alienists) or We will still have the Reduced Liberal Votes to Our Advantage.  If They Destroy Their Regimes, We can Wall-Off the others in the meantime and Establish Militias.

Ironically, the Rigging of the Scottish Secession Vote now seems also Intended to Ensure that Scotland would Vote Against Brexit.  I told you that a Wave of Secession would Follow in the Wake of Scotland, Regardless of the Politics that Provoked it, but now you see another Reason to Allow the Basque and Catalan to Secede; apart even from that these may Shift-Right, once they have it, as the Largest of the Pro-Independence Basque Parties - all of which are now Openly Communist - was an Anti-Communist Party until this was Dropped from its Platform in The '60's.

In the Quest for a Nation-State, many Forgot which Policies will Preserve one and that Our Race is to be Valued Above all the Components that must then still be Valued.  This Cuts Both Ways; the 
Spaniards once had a Preferable System to any of this, but today's Spanish Unionists are more Intent upon that Union than Spanish having anything to do with it but Remnants from Geo-Politics now Renounced for "Racism" a.k.a. being Perceived as somehow more Pro-White than what those doing the Decrying are Demanding.  Inroads were Created, but of a Leftist Variety; the "New", "Cool" and "Exiting" Communism, like Liberalism before it, took Basque by Storm.  Such an Insult to People who have Contributed Genetically to much of Europe, and Culturally so much to South America.  While Mongrels Corrupt, being Inherently Corrupted, the White Minorities of South America (so Overstated, as Addressed elsewhere) often have at least Partial Basque Descent or may Reside somewhere Established by Basques.  Yes, the "Jesuits" are not what these once were, pretty much the Opposite, but it's been said the two things that can Undeniably be Attributed to the Basques are the Jesuits and Chile.  Chile is a Clusterfuck of Dysfunction, between its Mongrels and its Brainwashed Whites, but it's still one of the Whiter Countries in South America and has a few Counter-Currents (Particularly with the Germanic Colonization) that Inspire Hope that such Tactics as I am Describing will be Implemented there.  Without a Soviet Menace, and with a Global Right-Shift in Public Opinion, and some Governments now somewhat Departing from Jewry's Agenda, with a Possible Balkanization of America to Ensue, and/or for at least one of those Offshoots to Assist in Global Pro-White Causes, one Imagines an Anti-Jewish Version of Pinochet; one who Kills More Dissidents, and Rejects The Chicago School for something more Smithian (something more Hitlerian or Fordian).  Additionally, America has still some Basque Communities.  Once, at least, these were Anti-Communist.  Idaho pretty much Owes its Statehood to the Basque, and these Lived Peacefully with other European Settlers; it was Good, until Jew Federalism Imposed Upon Traditional Communities.  I hear that today, however, Northern Idaho should just Secede from the Rest of the State.  We'll see if the Basque, and - Indeed - all European Americans, still Care more in Idaho for the Spirit of the State than the (perhaps still only Temporary) Borders of what would not be a State without that Spirit the Ancestors of these Populations still Possessed.

Catalan Modernism, as well, would now be Decried by many an Alienist as much too Traditional.  Not always my cup of tea, but some of it actually is quite Fine.  After all, the Ethno-Cultural Musical Melanges of The American South and the Interpretations thereof and those Partially Inspired thereby of "The British Invasion" as often are Retreats from that even more "Modern" as these were Circumstantially Offensive in the day.  Yes, some of it has Liberal Lyrics which cannot be Interpreted any other way (though They Frequently Speak Euphemistically, to Expand Their Audience and Generate Confusion About Their Intents) and/or is otherwise Fundamentally Subversive, but some of it would have been Praised by those Furious about it if only it had come from
someone else.  "Take only the honey."  While this must be Learnt in America and The U.K., and - Ultimately - Spread Globally, one Anticipates that the Catalan will at least Return to this Tradition; perhaps those Catalan Minorities in Ibero-America will do so, or even Lead The Way, with things Imported from The Homeland and anything Unique that was Developed by European Colonists in places like Mexico.

The above all goes to what I have been saying: Do not Confuse the Fundamental with the Incidental, and make your Adversary make Compromises with you; be on the Victorious Side of every Agreement, rather than Lying to yourself that you Stopped something that Lacked Power to Implement itself.  By Compromising with a Minority Opinion, or one which would become one if you were Stalwart in Opposition to it, you have merely Empowered Them.  Look at "Gun Control" (White Disarmament, in Effect, when not even Stated Intention, as Currently Practiced) or Abortion/Infanticide.  Look at "Integration".  Meanwhile, the Democrats in America - even some of the "Progressive" ones - actually did more to Fight these Issues than did the "Conservative" Republicans.  In Fact, many Acts of Congress and Executive Orders now Decried for Their Liberalism (Frequently, Both Sides Reference The Constitution) were once Championed by "Conservatives".  How many times have you heard someone saying "Ronald Reagan wouldn't have allowed this!", in Response to something Reagan actually Pushed or perhaps even Initiated?  Too Many, in my Case; enough to be Enlightened (Literally, rather than Euphemistically) on the Matter.  


When a Spending Bill comes around, don't shy away from Orchestras and Galleries that Perform or Exhibit Classical Pieces simply because Funding these with Tax Dollars is "Socialist".  All that means is "Social Belief" or "Social Practice", Literally, and has had many Conflicting Definitions in History, though some more Fundamentally and some more Circumstantially, but it is going to be Spent on something so why not Spend it on something Productive for Our Race?  As more of the Privately-Owned Versions will Expand their Repertoires to Compete with the Newfound Interest of the Relevant Public in the State, Federal or International Versions, there will be Less Need for such Spending; it may go in Cycles, or they may either Find Persistent Interest or even Cultivate their own Tastes enough to Insist on other Masterpieces Regardless of Sales (at least so long as they are not Losing Money, or - at very least - once it becomes Apparent this Statement was Ineffective at Changing Public Course in Favour of Talent's Appreciations; at which Point, those Truly Devoted to these Expanded Horizons will still Continue to Advocate Verbally for these Performances and Host them upon Request).  

Don't shy away from Contraceptive-Based Foreign Aid, if the Alternatives are Money for Them to Spend as it Pleases Them, a War On Their Behalf, something that Increases Their Birth-Rates, Life Expectancy (whether by Reducing Infant Mortality, Increasing Longevity or Both) or Fertility (Medically and/or Socio-Economically), or any Combination thereof.  If you must give Agricultural Supplies to Prevent those aforesaid Non-Alternatives - in the Sense that those Must Not Be Allowed – from Manifesting more Directly, have it Coupled with Birth-Control.  Ideally, either way, talk about Abstinence.  Agricultural Aid is still Preferable to Medical Aid, as They are Frequently Agriculturally Incompetent.  At least, They often Steal Medical Supplies, Attack Medical Personnel, Spread Rumors Against Medical Sciences and Staffs, and Charge Steep Black Market Prices.  Regardless, We should Prefer for Them to have Sterilization (perhaps Offered, at least in Temporary Effect, anywhere in the World, in Exchange for what would be a lot of Money for Them but either Spare Change for Us or at least Considerably Less than the Alternative Expenditures) or at least Non Condom Contraceptives.  Condoms Sometimes Fail, and with Considerably Greater Frequency Amongst Non-Whites.  However, even O.T.C. Medications like Tylenol can Negate “The Pill”.  Therefore, if not Sterilization, They should be Provided with Spermicides.  Condoms Sometimes Prevent S.T.D.s, but an Over-Reliance upon Them can Spread them; while more of Their Deaths would be Good for Us under Our Rule, We would be Extorted by Present Regimes in Response to this.  A Decrease in S.T.D.s in those Populations might Result in Increased Non-White Births, at least if They aren’t Provided with Abortions or Sterilization.     


Don't shy away from Utilizing Public Lands, simply because that's a Euphemism for Government-Owned; while I do Prefer Privatization, though with Codes to be Rigidly Enforced when it's a Matter of National Heritage or the Survival of at least a Community [such as neither being Allowed to Desecrate a Church by Transforming the Building into an Amusement Park, as was done in The Netherlands, nor to Destroy these Altogether, as done Recently to one in France and as They are Planning in Regards to some of the Bone Churches (rather than Reinforcing these with Modern Technology, as Indicates that talk of "Structural Concerns" is a False Pretense), nor to Dam a River or Drain a Lake a Community is Reliant upon - at least without Consulting these People on Producing an Alternative at least as Viable to them - simply for your Profit or Ego], these places will - if not Utilized by Us - Continue only to be Privatized into the Vile Clutches of those even more Anti-White than those Possessing them now or to be the Victims of these Foolish Campaigns for Black Attendance of Municipal, State or "National" Parks.


Don't shy away from Communal Gardens, simply because it says "Communal".  Think about what this Word actually Means, and why it was thus Perverted by Jewry.  Either you've already Paid into this or will be Fined somehow for not Partaking in it, if not both, and why not Encourage the Cultivation of Higher Quality Produce than would otherwise be Available?  The more Voluntary it is, in Function, the Less you should be Complaining from a Voluntarist Standpoint.  The more Beneficial it is to you and/or your Neighbor, in a Racial Sense, the Less you should be Complaining from the Viewpoint of the only Collectivism that actually has Merit.  


I have Spoken elsewhere about how True Environmentalism Is White-Wing, so in Contrast to the Pseudo-Sciences of the many Leftists that Veiled "Red" In "Green", which Includes those "Eco-Conservatives" more Opposed to Us than Them, and Touched upon the other Issues herein Discussed, and many of the Examples that I have Provided, some much more In Depth in other Entries, but I wanted more a Consolidation and to Update the Circumstances of my Considerations.  


I have Spoken of my Disdain for the so-called Aristocracy, so Hostile to that Principle, as those Labeled such Generally are, so you see there is a Limit to what Alliances are Possible; not all Relationships are Worthwhile, and not all that is Worthwhile is Easy.  However, if you have to Ignore Realities to Feel you have a Productive Relationship for the Views you Claim to Adhere to, you need to take your Feelings elsewhere; this is not Productive for Us, but is Enabling Them.  You may think you are Tempering Them, but We've gone over this; They don't have the Power, anyway, or you aren't Impacting Them as you Believe you are, but They are Retarding you.  


Contrast that with how the N.S.D.A.P. and the Communists were United in a Vote of No Confidence, but Street Brawls, Assassinations and Public Fear of Communism no longer being Bridled by "Conservatives" that Answered to "Progressives" would Produce a Right-Shifting Populace.  So it is with the aforementioned Basque, Catalan and Northern Irish, who Generally - albeit not necessarily Applicable to Politicians - aren't nearly as Perverse as The Wiemar Republic.  Wiemar, itself, was once nothing like that; it Improved Considerably Under N.S.D.A.P. 
Tutelage.  Indeed, Berlin had been Transformed by Jews like Magnus Hirschfeld into The Degeneracy Capital of The West.  Under Hitler, it became a Symbol of Our Revival.  Even that Flag that is now so Widely Recognized would not Exist if Hitler had Allowed for Communists to Steal The Colour Red.  Instead, this Artist would Remember it was a Colour of Power and Passion, and one that Caught the Eye.  The Jews had Chosen it for a Reason; by Perverting its Historical Associations, it Created Mass Appeal for what would otherwise be Rejected.  Indeed, much was spoken of Tradition, Decentralization, Protection and "The redistribution of wealth among the masses" by those Hostile to Tradition, that Consolidated Their Power, that Mass-Murdered and Mass-Raped Our People, and that Impoverished The Masses both Materially and Spiritually.

Yes, there were Flaws in "National Socialism", more what was Practiced than what was Promised, but We will Inevitably be Labeled "Nazis" - a Preferable Label to "Fascist", in that the latter had even Less to do with Racial Purity and Our Cultures - so that's another Reason that We might as well Study that which Historically has Pertained to it.  

Monday, June 20, 2016

Additional Thoughts On Trump's Popularity

Why is Trump so Popular?  Let's Count The Ways:

Basically, Trump Implements The Sailer Strategy.  Others have Written on this Matter, so let's skip to why People are making such a big deal over him saying "America First" when McCain also said it but no one would Dare to Pretend there were any Comparison to Charles Lindbergh. McInsane's Voters already Knew that he was a Socialist, with a Long Record of Cosponsoring Liberal Bills with Jews, so any "Lindbergh Comparison" Lie by Democrats would have Resulted in one of two Reactions:  


One would be what They Desire, which is for everyone to Insist that "Conservativism Isn't Racist" from the Viewpoint of a Cognitive Dissonance-Suffering White i.e. that a Leftward Shift "MUST" be Embraced to Prove it; that any Sacrifices of Democratic-Republican Values that would be Viable in a Pro-White World are "Necessary", because - as We should all Know by now - it is Liberalism [this Liberation From Morality; this Bind to its Satanism (that is, Opposition)] it is actually Conserving.  


The other is that they would have Shifted Right, so Dreaded by Jewry and those Eagerly of its Dominion, while some sort of Alliance between Pat Buchanan, Jim Traficant, Joseph Sobran, Tom Tancredo, Willis Carto and Ron Paul would have been Viable.  Putin and his Allies would have Shifted Right if these Displayed any Sympathy for any Motive at all.  There must have been a Fear of the latter, since - though such Games were Played on a Small Scale; to Increase as time went on and nothing Significant was done by Whites for Our Defence - They didn't really Push the "Nazi" Narrative in any so Intricate a Method as with the Parallels that have been Crafted for Trump.  


They must not want People to think "too much" about the Issue, however, because these Points - the Practices of which are of Varying Qualities - are mostly Neglected in that Context.  A Switch in International Policy with Regards to Mexico, Support from Indians, Mixed Relations with the Arabic-Identifying World, Early Support from Jews which Largely Dissipated as he became more Popular (in Part, because he did not Appear to have been Purchased by Jews), a Promise of Cooperating with Russia (though it hasn't been Properly Desovietized, as that would have Essentially been a Nazification Program, it had been a Sort of "Americanized" and now is - sometimes more as a Veil, and sometimes more Genuine Practice - "Rerussifying"), and Policies that Align him more with the New Leaders of Slovakia, Hungary and Italy, a Minority Support from Blacks and Mexicans that The Mainstream is Confused by (but is basically Submitting to a Dominant Power for Self-Preservation, though while Waiting To Strike), and his aforementioned Populism that Shifts Rightwards but Employs some Rhetoric that was (though Ironically) Previously Largely Leftist... those are a few Similarities to Hitler you might not have Noticed, while everyone was going on about his (Jewish) Campaign Advisor having slipped some "Nazis" into his American Flag Poster.  Of course, today's Right-Wing Polish Youth and the Possibility of a Sympathetic Polish Government are Major Changes to this.  However, these are just some of Various Developments in a Push towards Creating the Power Bloc that was Proposed by a German-Sympathetic Polish Nationalist.  "Turkey" being N.A.T.O.'s Lapdog has been an Issue, but a New Leader who Holds N.A.T.O.'s Reigns could be a Dramatic Upset.  They have made Unfounded Accusations of Incestuous Desires about both, which is Ironic in that They Promote Incest.   Of course, it's really Aimed at Removing someone whose Policies are anywhere near Viable.  Thus, while Pursuing Better Leadership is always Advisable, it's Reasonable to both Dismiss these Accusations and Focus on what Our Opponents are Provably Doing Wrong.  One Difference is that Trump did not Rise from Poverty, and another is that he never Considered becoming a Priest.  He also was never a War Hero, much less one who (together with another Soldier) Shielded a General from Enemy Fire with his own Body whilst Firing Back.  But he's not exactly Andrew Jackson, either, and (God Forbid) would probably be more a Teddy Roosevelt if he did have a Distinguished Military Record.  So, he's not THAT Similar.   Discussing this, however, Presents the Possibility of Sympathizing with Hitler.  They do love for "Neo-Nazis" to run around like Hooligans, often Uneducated, Multi-Racial, Meth-Cooking and/or Mestizo-Screwing as They are, but anything Sophisticated with an Hitlerian Connotation would Terrify Them. 


But Trumpites aren't actually that far along, even if not - at least Subconsciously - still Programmed to Respond as Desired if an Order to Attack Russia is handed down.  So, what is it?  


He'll say or at least Hint at things everyone else Knows and has Known for Years, but no one else will say or even Hint at: He talked Openly about how he Networks with Both Parties, but Insists that he's going to do what he Promises.  People actually Trust him, because everyone is used to this Networking but being Betrayed by those that won't Admit it or Insist that Pandering now will - somehow - Convince Liberals to Comply later.  It's like something out of a Tom Clancy Book/Film, where Jack Ryan says to Play-Up your Friendship with the Suspicious Businessman while you Deny any Knowledge of his Illegal Activities; you leave the Media nowhere to go.  Naturally, everyone assumes "He's being honest because he has nothing to hide".  


He will talk about how he has Factories in Foreign Countries but that he would like to Move them to America; it simply isn't Cost-Efficient, so he had to Wait until America's Economy could be Improved enough by other Means and/or those either Purchasing from (or, to Neighborhoods that are Guarded and/or Removed from where Mongrels are Accelerate this Process, as the aforesaid Generally Reside in Whiter Infesting) or Voting for him Demand it. 


He's Splitting Ron Paul's Base, because he isn't Viewed as having Compromised on Racial Issues; he's seen as an Emerging Voice, and even some Libertarians really aren't sure Their Liberty is even as Valuable as - much less more than - Ours.  He might be Left of Paul in some Economic Matters, and Economics are really what's Driving his Feigned Racialism, which is an Unsettling Thought, but he's still Right of Paul on many Social Issues that - try as Paul might to Convince you otherwise - actually do have an Impact on The Economy.  He may be Left of where Paul was some 40 Years Ago, but so is basically every other Politician (Including Ron Paul).  Paul's just Angry that he's not Venerated as a God like he once was, by the Minority that it was, and that "God Emperor Trump" is Beating him at his own Game.  Basically, he took a Melange of Ron Paul's Policies over the Decades and Came Off Sounding More Masculine while doing so.  I've talked about the Paul/Trump Relationship, in the past, and what Horrors could come under this and from Jews like Adam Kokesh.  I must say, though, that I am Surprised at Trump's Meteoric Rise not being Sidelined by a Ron Paul Contention of any Significance; he's merely Bitching and Moaning from The Sidelines, rather than Campaigning.  Strangely, Ron Paul's Managed To Avoid The "Cuck" Label.  Maybe it's the Reverse of the aforementioned Ryan Technique, like how I have always Feared that Trump was only being Ridiculed by Establishment Republicans so he'd Appear an Outsider.  Likewise, Republicans are now Harder than ever Pushing for Universal Armament; I am Opposed to this for the same Reason that I am Opposed to White Disarmament: It Makes Anti-White Warfare Easier.  Obama is Insane, but he isn't actually THAT Stupid; he's The World's Greatest Gun Salesman by Intent. If Paul were Consulted on this Matter, Regardless of what he Intends to do once in any Position of Power, or Public Demand simply Forces the two to Play Nice (after all, Trump Literally Wrote The Book On "The Art of The Deal"), maybe he'll start Singing A Different Tune.  


He can say that he could Shoot someone in Time Square and not Lose a Single Vote, and the only ones that Complain will be those already not Voting for him anyway.  Why?  He's The Only One Not Threatening To Murder Everyone. Trump can Threaten China and North Korea (like The Establishment only wants if it can Control "Refugee" Intake, War's Methodology and a Subversive Media, like a John Le Carre Novel/Miniseries but with Jews to make it even more Sinister), while Threatening to Abandon South Korea (both Militarily and Economically) if it doesn't pick up the Slack, and even the Rest of N.A.T.O. for the same Reason, by Promising to Negotiate with Putin instead of Fighting him.  Furthermore, it's because he talks about Saudis Supporting Islamic State and says there are others; he won't Name Them, because he has "Friends" in the Region, but - of course - he has "Friends" everywhere, as such Networking is Putting him in Power, and then he can do almost whatever he wants, but he'll tell the Talking Head that's Mocking him for not Naming the one he really wants to now that he - like everyone - already Knows.  Thus, he Implies "I will Cooperate with you for Mutual Gain, but you've got to Stop Subverting America."


Of course, Jewry is Incapable of that.  We'll see what he's actually Willing to do, with his Jewish In-Laws and Grandchildren.  Has he Sold his Soul and those of his Offspring to The Devil, for Political Gain?  Will he Ban Them From Inheriting, before he's Assassinated or - even if They have to Wait until he's no longer President, though perhaps Stirring Controversy by Raising this Accusation during his Presidency - Accusing him of some Mental Instability that would Result (if They have one of the many "Judges" that would Jump at the Opportunity) in a "Temporary Guardianship"?  The latter could be Cited to Discourage Political Support, and those Suggesting this will simply be Declared Paranoid.  So on and so forth will The Great Global Witch Hunt go.  Someone saying that Jewry might want to Assassinate him will be Claimed as "Proof" of how "Paranoid" his Supporters are, and he'll be Ridiculed for having Suggested it himself.  Sure, some - Including Politicians - have already Called for his Assassination... but They'll just say this weren't Serious, and everyone Ought to have been Smart enough to Know that, Mocking Us every Possible way, while Insisting those that are Clearly Serious even to Their Supporters that have just enough Scruples to Speak Out (or merely Wish to Save Face by Appearing that way) will be Dismissed as "No Serious Threat".  Perhaps so, but perhaps They are a Threat to his Supporters.  Additionally, those They do Support - and which have no Issue with being Associated with Their Support have more than Plentiful Means with which to have him Assassinated.  Neither Motive nor Opportunity are Proof of Guilt, but both - Particularly when Coupled - are Reason For Suspicion.  


You would think that We would take to The Internet and The Streets, and Challenge Them in The Courts if for no other Reason than The Press. They Harder The Push, They Harder We Push Back. ...Right?  Well, perhaps; Trump has become the Face of that, even Encouraging those who would not otherwise be Associated with it, but They are Jews that We're talking about.  People seem very Forgiving, even out of those Knowing that They are Edomites, simply because of that Fact.  "Jews Are Scary!" is what it comes down to.  So, We Must Be Scary.  We can't merely Challenge Jews, though, nor any other Foreign Race or what even Main Streamers still call Perversion, or those Loyal to Them may Feel Unprecedented Resolve, and those Fence Sitters will Fall Over to Their Side, but Challenge all that Opposes Us in any Capacity. "You Are Not Free.  You Are Not Equal.  You Are Not Human, Unless We Say So."
  

Vote Trump, But Trump Will Not Save Us.  Like Jose Primo de Rivera Knew, Only Violence Will Save Us.
  

Tuesday, May 31, 2016

On America's Role in its Mexican Crisis

Americans were Instrumental in Shaping much of the Mestizo Violence of Mexico, though that's not to say it had not been a Long and Sordid History of Violence before America ever Existed.

Its Creel Family is Descended from a Union Ambassador. A Member of a Unionist Branch of The Bowie Family was a "Colonel" (#2 Bandit) in one of the many Zapatista-Associated Revolutions, and that got Intertwined with Creel.
Though this Ancestor was without such Political Connections, Former Mexican President Vicente Fox (Previously, "Fuchs") is Descended in Part from a German American from Cincinnati.

Although he is also of Partial Basque Descent, he is not the European he is often Alledged to be; his Paternal Grandmother, often Neglected in Biographies, was a Mestiza.  

Today, many "Aryan Brotherhood" Types, even when not Mestizos, Themselves, are Miscegenating with Mestizos and/or Protecting Mestizo Cartel Shipments Into America.

But let's go back to the Well-Connected, Historical Personas:

Creel-Bowie Bred together with a Daughter of Luis Terrazas, who was from Mexico and - like Creel was doing - would Profit off of not only Government Contracts but Financing Revolutions to Expand that Income. Terrazas even would Use his Position as Governor of Chihuahua to Move Armies in and out of Areas he Intended to Purchase or Sell to Reduce or Augment Prices in his Favour. Terrazas was a Political Ally and Confidant of Benito Juarez, even Hosting him at his Hacienda.

Two Examples of Terrazas' Wealth are that when someone from Swift (the American Meat Packer) asked if he could Supply 100 Head of Cattle, he Replied "In what color?", and that he also Owned so much of its Land (not to Mention that he Owned its Railroad) that when someone asked him at a Social Function if he were from Chihuahua, he Replied "I am not from Chihuahua, Chihuahua is mine."

Enrique Creel and Mexican Victoriano Huerta were Arrested for Purchasing $895,000 in Arms from Germany, while in America with other Mexicans and Indoctrinated Whites. Thus, the former two were Arrested for Violating U.S. Neutrality. Ironically, America had been Illegally Arming The U.K. through Civilian Vessels that it would Deny were Bearing Weapons until after WWI. So, Germany - having an Interest in Recruiting Mexico to its Side - would Sell Weapons to these same Socialists and Communists that America was no Stranger to Conducting Business with. Both would Escape, though Pascual Orozco (who, though of Basque Descent, and the Wealthy Owner of a Gold Mine, had Adopted the Marxist Cause of The Mazatec Magón Brothers) would not be so Fortunate.

These Banditos were once Allies of Pancho Villa, and he even Starred in at least one Hollywood Movie that Glamorized his Banditry. Bear In Mind this was AFTER he was Unsuccessfully Chased Across The Desert by The U.S. Army. He ended up being Killed by other Revolutionaries. They Frequently Switched Sides. It was the same Year that Luis Terrazas would Die of Old Age. This is Significant because he Split with Villa, having Accused him of Rustling Cattle, and Villa's Response was to Kidnap Luis's Son.

The only thing Positive that I have to say about Terrazas, not Extending from such a Personal Grievance as the above, is that Teddy Roosevelt had Convinced him to Purchase Land for Boer Refugees from The Anglo-Boer War. Boer, at the time, were Popular in America; there were even Board Games (of such a Variety as "Risk") that Glorified them, and Toy Soldiers and Calvary of Boer Guerrillas. While it Initially Thrived, the Colony later Dissipated; many would Emigrate (Legally) to America, and some even became Important Figures in such Major Events as The Louisiana Purchase. Unfortunately, I still have Mostly-Negative things to say about Teddy Roosevelt.

America liked Porfirio Diaz, as a "Capitalist", which basically meant he Supported what today is called "N.A.F.T.A." It liked Plutarco Elias Calles, a Jew-Mestizo and Masonic Communist, for a Combination of the same Motive and that he was Violently Suppressing Catholicism.

Notice that even Adam Smith, the so-called Founder of Capitalism (who never Used that Term - as it was Coined by Rabbi Moses Mordecai Levy a.k.a. Karl Heinrich Marx), had 18 Conditions (Conveniently Neglected by Capitalism's Aforementioned True Founder) for which Government may Intervene in Otherwise-Private Affairs.

Upon such Grounds, many would later Lambaste Henry Ford Sr. as a "Socialist". He was neither a Capitalist nor a Communist, thus, as Marx was really Describing Libertarianism (Formalized by more Jews, like Hans Kelsen), though Offering a Non-Solution, but he had Comparable Differences with many all would Label a "Socialist".

While The "N.S.D.A.P." was a Grab-Bag of Dissidents, and he was only Elected its Leader as a Compromise by a Party-Bloc that was under both Internal (both in the Sense of the Party Bloc and The Wiemar Republic) and External Pressures (again, both from The Wiemar Republic and Outside Germany), this is why Hitler was so often Opposed by others also Labeled Socialists yet - though not a Communist - he spoke of Plundering by Capitalists.


Being as its Literal Meanings are merely "Social Belief" or "Social Practice", any Negative Sense of "Socialism" should be Defined as Follows: Any Atraditional Fusion (as Relates to European Civilization) of Government and another Sector; Particularly, in a Detrimental Manner.  

Sunday, May 15, 2016

Nominating Nominees

Trump's going to have to make a Litany of Changes to his Cabinet, and those he Appoints are going to have to do another Thorough Housecleaning for their own Underlings. Under some of those in The Line of Succession, there is another Line of Succession; under others, an Internal Election Process.

Unfortunately, Jim Traficant is Dead.  He would have been an Excellent President, Secretary of State, Secretary of the Interior, Secretary of Agriculture, Secretary of Commerce, or Secretary of Housing and Urban Development.  A Stunning Upset that would have been.  I Suspect he was Murdered.

Here, however, are some Suggestions; while I don't necessarily Agree with everything these Stand for, I am Assigning Positions in which Defects will be Minimized and Advantages will be Maximized [or - should We be Horribly Betrayed - The System will be Exposed in such Fashion as Ought to Irk enough Outrage (whether Internal, International or Both) to Result in Collapse]:

Vice President: Pat Buchanan.

Qualifications: Former Adviser to Presidents Richard Nixon, Gerald Ford and Ronald Reagan, a Popular Author, Columnist and Commentator, and Winner of Several States in the 1996 Republican Presidential Primary.

Personal Commentary: I'd have liked a President Buchanan, but "The Don" will have to be Tolerated... for now.

Alternative Pat Buchanan Nomination: Anything, really, like Traficant.  Perhaps, Secretary of Housing and Urban Development.  That would really throw a Wrench in Their Ungodly, Genocidal Agenda.


Alternative V.P. Nomination: Tom Tancredo.

Qualifications: A Former Congressman and Honorary Chairman of "Youth For Western Civilization", he Opposes Illegal Immigration, Supports Civics Literacy-Based Voting Eligibility, is Economically Right of Neo-Cons, and has Served on Numerous Congressional Committees.

Personal Commentary: I like a lot of what he says, and having a Right-Wing Italian anywhere in his Administration will Foster the Ties that Trump has Developed with Lega Nord.

Alternative Tom Tancredo Nomination: Basically, what I said for Buchanan.


Secretary of Defence: (Four Star) General (Retired) James Mattis.

Qualifications: 11th Commander of "United States Central Command"; who Previously Served as Commander of the "United States Joint Forces Command" and - Concurrently - "Supreme Allied Commander Transformation", after Commanding "I Marine Expeditionary Force", "United States Marine Forces Central Command" and "1st Marine Division" in The Iraq War, and Implemented "COIN" (Counter-Insurgency) Strategy.

Personal Commentary: A Popular General, with the Respect of the Rank and File, he was once Propositioned with a Write-In Campaign for President; he Responded that he had given no thought to a Presidential Campaign, and has Subsequently been Suggested as a V.P. Pick for Trump.  People Want Mattis. James Mattis, Call Sign "Chaos", has also been Nicknamed "Warrior Monk" and - perhaps Best-Known - "Mad Dog".   Part of his Popularity is the Result of Statements that were Well-Received by Soldier and Civilian Alike; there are some Real Gems, so Google him.

 Alternative James Mattis Nomination: Secretary of Veterans Affairs.


Alternative "SecDef" Nomination: (Four Star) Admiral (Retired) James Lyons.

Qualifications: Former "Commander in Chief of the U.S. Pacific Fleet", "Senior U.S. Military Representative to the United Nations" and "Deputy Chief of Naval Operations".

Personally Commentary: Although Lesser Known than Mattis, he is Obviously Accomplished and Deserves Credit for Admitting that the three things The Navy cannot Maintain Order and Discipline with On Board a Ship are a Thief, a Drug User or Pusher, and a Homosexual.  He also Deserves Credit for being The First Major Military Officer to Publicly Accuse Obama/Soetoro of being Complicit in The Benghazi Embassy Attack; he Believes it was a False Flag, which is why the Marines were Ordered to Stand Down and the Drone in the Vicinity was Withheld by Hillary "Killery" Clinton (who was not even Eligible for that Position, as she Voted in the Prior Term to Raise Emoluments for that Position; an Expressly Constitutionally Prohibited Offense and thus High Treason), and the Marines' Attempt to Save American Lives had Convinced Muslims/Jihadists that They had been Betrayed and it - thus - became Real.

Alternative James Lyons Nomination: Secretary of Veterans Affairs.


Secretary of State: (Former) Congressman Ron Paul.

Qualifications: A Multiple-Term Congressman, Retired Military Captain and Supported on Issues of National Defence by Numerous High-Profile Intelligence Professionals, he Supports Stronger Border Security, as well as Secession, and Opposes Amnesty, "Birthright Citizenship" for the Offspring of an Illegal (a.k.a. "Anchor Babies"), and Welfare for Illegals.  The 2012 Republican Primary was Stolen from him by Electoral Jury-Rigging by a Romney-Supporting Delegate in Maine.

Personal Commentary: As much as I Abhor Libertarianism, and I do so as much as I Abhor Communism, I will Endorse this Popular Nomination if for no other Reason that he is not an Advocate of WWIII; for all his many Differences with Russia, he is Advocating Non-Aggression. There is also the Possibility that, though he may Falsely Propagandize about Us, he will not Intervene if We were to Secede and/or Introduce Racialist States' Rights Issues.

Alternative Ron Paul Nominations: "Secretary of the Treasury" or "Surgeon General".

Qualifications:

For "SecTres": Opposes The Unconstitutional, Quasi-Governmental "Federal Reserve Banking System", and is Economically-Right of Neo-Conservatives.

For "Surgeon General": A Medical Doctor, he was a Flight Surgeon, an Obstetrician and a Gynecologist.


Too bad Robert Bork is Dead.  He would have been my Supreme Court Justice.


White House Chief of Staff: His Current Butler.

Qualifications: Similar Responsibilities.

Personal Commentary: No Senate Confirmation Necessary, for this Position, means his Butler who Refers to Hillary as "Killary" and Suggests Carpet Bombing Ferguson may be Appointed by President Trump.

Tuesday, January 26, 2016

On Patton

There is a lot of Idolization of General George S. Patton, Jr., by both Left and Right, in America, because Mainstream Viewpoints seem him as an Important Figure in Fighting "Nazism" and "Defending America" [as if America were in any Real Danger, as even Pearl Harbor - Nominally, a Response to America having Severed Japan's Oil Supply (as if this were so Vital; its Ability to Wage War with America is Proof that it could have Fulfilled its Promise to Germany to Unite to Overthrow The Soviet Union, at least had it not Chosen the former instead) - was Warned of by Dusan Popov (who was told he had "warned the wrong office") and simply Allowed by F.D.R. and his Cadres because it Provided a Pretense to Enter WWII on The Soviet Union's Behalf (which Effectively makes Japan an Allied Power)] and by certain Dissident Elements because he Eventually Testified to the Jewish Nature of Bolshevism and the Moral Superiority of Germany, as well as his (Arrogantly Announced) Intention to take his Army and Seize The Kremlin. There is a lot of Speculation about whether he would have Recruited P.O.W.s and Served as a Replacement for Germany's Support of The White Russian Liberation Army, or if he would Continue to Misclassify the Russians in with the Central Asian, Uralic and East Siberian Turkish Types that Ravaged Europe in an On-Going Jewish Revolution simply Based in Russia (though, today, at least as much so in America) and perhaps thus Genocide them. Perhaps the Germans would have been Capable of Preventing this, if that were on his Conflicted Mind, even if only through such Means as to Convince him of Military and/or Economic Reasons not to. Would those Romanovs not having been Murdered by Jewry even give such Situational Support to this Rogue Alliance as it gave to The Soviet Bastards (on the Absolutely Asinine Pretense that Germany was "Invading" and Georgian Dzhugashvili Stalin was "Protecting Russia", while he was actually the Aggressor, Genociding Europeans of many Ethnicities, Suppressing Christianity and European Cultures in General, and otherwise Creating a Climate of General Despair)? How would The Allies have Reacted, had he not Announced what he was going to do and just did it? What would he have done about the Jews, in any Case, if it were in his Power? Execution, just Deportation, or even just Continued Containment to Concentration Camps and other Ghettos, or some Inherently-Flawed Plan of "Reconstruction"? Worst is when someone Demands "Assimilation", as if Jewry isn't Secretly Gleeful that it is Provided with this Opportunity to Deceive and Miscegenate Freely (while perhaps Simultaneously Revolting on the False Pretense that this isn't Exactly what it Desires, so that it can Provoke European Fratricide on its Behalf while Deciding what Manifestations of Jewishness it wants to Preserve through which Means). What makes me most Indignant, is that those like Patton could Easily have Prevented that War and all the Subsequent Hellishness of Global "Reconstruction"; if John J. "Nigger Jack" Pershing was too Senile, as his Role in WWII was basically to sit behind a desk and push a pen around, between shouting "Frontal Assault!" like a Raving Lunatic with No Military Experience whatsoever, since Ike was even more Deranged, with his P.O.W. Rhineland Death Camps and Generally Savage Treatment of Germanics, and Mark W. Clark being a Half-Jew, one thinks Patton would have gone to Walter Krueger and asked him if he really Enjoyed Murdering his Brethren or was only doing it because he Believed in Blind Loyalty to whatever Country one's Parents had made him a Citizen of.  One thinks he would have gone to Omar Bradley, and asked him if he'd Stand - having Righteousness on their Side - more Bravely with him on the Side of the Germans as the two did under German Artillery Fire in the last Great Fratricide that America Entered on a False Pretense.  One thinks Patton would have gone to Douglas MacArthur and his Son (Arthur MacArthur, Jr.), and Inquired as to Loyalties.  

If Albert Coady Wedemeyer was really so Anti-Communist, why did he Fight for The Allies? Perhaps if Patton were Recruiting Rogues, he wouldn't have Turned the Training he Received from the Germans as a Pre-War Exchange Student into such Unnecessarily-Fratricidal Application.   

Patton also could have gone to Stanley Dunbar Embick, Weddemeyer's Father-In-Law, if he wanted to Devastate U.S. Strategic Command.  Imagine if Embick had been Convinced that The United Nations should be for Common Defence of European Peoples and Cultures, instead of just Obeying whatever Washington was doing at the time.  

Walton Walker was one of Patton's Subordinates, so he could have simply given him Orders for a Private War simply too Classified for anyone to Inquire about; if ever he Demonstrated such Sympathies as those of Patton, he could have been brought into the Fold for more Direct Action.

Lesley J. McNair was a Disaster for those who had to Serve under him, as were those he Appointed to Commands; one wonders if it were not a Silver Lining, that someone more Effective at Murdering Europeans in another Country was not given the Commands of these Figures more Effective at Wasting the Lives of Their Own Countrymen.  

Perhaps if Patton had gone to Jacob L. Devers, he could have Talked some Sense into him (or Threatened him, if Necessary); he was the one Leading the Charge for a Better Tank, while McNair would Repeatedly Inhibit that Progression.  As it were, he is someone it's Unfortunately wasn't one of the Commanders to Die from Artillery Fire; the Insufficiency of the M4 Sherman Tank he Helped Design and Implement is Suggestive of a Complete Disaster for The Allied Forces if it only had the Artillery Magnet that the M3 Lee was.  

Gordon P. Saville, Benjamin Foulois, Claire Lee Chennault and Benjamin S. Kelsey all worked with Devers, in Reintroducing to American Forces and Refining The Concept of Aerial Reconnaissance.  They also Introduced the Concept of Pursuit Aircraft, rather than Precision Bombing, though - like Arthur "Bomber" Harris, Charles Portal and Hastings Ismay in The U.K. - Harold H. Arnold, Ira C. Eaker and Carl Andrew Spaatz were Supporters of Terror Bombing.  

Devers was Acquainted with Eaker, if not the others, so one wonders how much he actually Knew and Approved; one can Easily Hide behind Plausible Deniability, and saying "I was just Concerned for my Troops." will all too often Override Logic in the Minds of those Hearing this Drivel about the Troops those Spouting such Rhetoric would still be Sending into Combat on Behalf of Rapists and Murderers.  

Garrison H. Davidson was Simple Insane, since he Presided over those Farcical Nuremberg Trials; if ever False Confessions Obtained Via Torture have become Doctrinal to a New Religion, Davidson would be its False Prophet.  

Even if none of those from the U.K. were Willing to Join him, perhaps these still - at least if having either Met him in Person or one of those other Generals as a Delegate from or Mediator for his Rogue Army - would not have Fought him.

Wednesday, January 20, 2016

"But that's just Semantics."

 It is Important to Note that Adam Smith (often Championed, or - Alternatively - Condemned, as "The Founder of Capitalism") is not actually a "Capitalist", in the Sense that the latter was Coined by Rabbi Moses Mordecai Levy a.k.a. Karl Heinrich Marx (The Founder of "Communism"). 

Smith did Believe in Police for Public Order, and for Barriers to be Placed when National Defence or Public Health (he called for the Prevention of Loathsome Diseases, and Explicitly Referenced Leprosy) were Threatened by Opulence. It is True that Smith did Believe in Human Rights, but he Believed that Liberties were to Necessarily be Suppressed to Prevent National Calamity. 

Smith would have been Renounced as a "Socialist", by the "Lassie-Faire" Types that Renounce Ford as such; these were the Sort that would Conspire with "Communists", for there is often much to Gain at another's Expense. 

After all, the "Classical School of Economics" was Originally "Socialist"; it was not Founded by Smith, but - rather - some of it did Influence him. That, however, is often as in Contrast with Marx's Perception of "Socialism" as it is with what Critics call "Feudalism". 

Feuds are Present in every System, and Invading Hordes of Moorish and Turkish - each having Their Jewish Powers - were the Cause of so many Feuds; even when not Directly Feuding with Them, the Egos that They had Inflamed in both those They had Subjugated - at least in the Sense of Extorting for the Retention of any Autonomy; being not Sovereigns, to Pay such a thing - and those Il-Informed about the Events in these other Lands whom Blamed Entire Nations for the Tragic Outcomes of the Ceaseless Invasions were the Causes of so many Wars. 

There are many Efforts to Conflate the two, "Communism" and Monarchy, but - in European Traditions - the Differences are Greater than the Similarities; the Similarities are Present in every System, if one is looking at the Vague Semblances one would have to not Investigate Further to Believe anything Significant is Shared with "Communism". 

Sure, the Marxists will talk of "State Capitalism"... but that's the Essence of "Communism"; that it is Controlled by the State. The Nominal Difference is that the "State Capitalist" is in it for Profit, whereas the "Communist" is in it for "Equality"; the Reality is that there can be no Equality, which is why something is always Dominating something else. 

Rather than having Private Ownership and thus the Funds from the Sale going first to said Owner(s), then some Form and Extent of Payment going - after some Duration - to the Worker(s), a "Communist" wants everything in the hands of a Government that Distributes from those with the Greatest Merit to those with the Least; "Socialization" will either Return to what he called "Capitalism" or Descend into what he called "Communism", as it Refers to when the Workers are all Owners and/or Engaged in a Democratic Operation. 

For that to be Different than Voluntary Enterprises he would call "Capitalism", it Necessitates Counter-Meritocratic Force; every Endevour (of the Gentiles) must be Equal, in every Way, Shape and Form, so a "Communist" Elite must Exist [the Collective Messiah (being Anointed in Our Blood) of this False Religion, being as it is Allowed to - Ostensibly - Violate the Vile Doctrines and Dogmas it Imposes upon the Host Nations] to Enforce this upon those Subjects of it this Mandate is Applied to Exclusively. 

It may Pretend to be "First Among Equals", but it will not Allow for Us to Remove it from Power; even to have Turns would be to Admit there's some Value to this Change, and thus that there's an Inequality.  That's why when a Gentile is in a Nominal Position of Power, he or she will always Answer to Jewry; the other Races would have been Eradicated many Ages ago, had it not been for Jewry's Intervention On Their Behalf.  They have no Concern for those Races, with the Exception of Their Ability to Utilize Them as Weapons Against Us; even Jewry's Survival is a Lesser Concern for Them than Our Destruction, or this would be an Exercise In Futility. 

We Realize, thus, that "Libertarianism" is the Corporate Face of "Communism"; its Admonition of Our Race is Synonymous with all Satanic Filth, and its Hyper-Individualism always Transforms into an Alienist Collectivism whenever We should - as Individuals - Choose that (to Jewry) Dreaded Choice of Cooperating Among Ourselves to Ensure Our Survival.