It's Ironic how Guernica is Condemned as a Terror Bombing (though the City was of Military Importance) by the same Allied Forces that Condone the Terror Bombing of Dresden, Despite the latter not being of Military Importance (though They will Insist there was a Communications Outpost there and that this, somehow, Justifies a Mass Genocide!).
According to some Estimates of the Guernica Casualties, more People Died from Suffocation in one Over-Taxed Bomb Shelter in Dresden than in all of Guernica.
That said, I do not Approve of the Tactics used on Guernica; I Approve even Less of those used on Dresden.
It's Questionable about whether there was one of the Traditional Market Days that Monday, as a General Edict had been Issued by the Republican Regime to Postpone these on Account of the War; anyplace both of Cultural Significance and having two Arms Manufacturers, surely would have been kept Alerted.
Either way, it might not even have been 1/13th as many Victims as Initially Reported; even a High Estimate would put it at 4.135 Times Less than Initially Reported, and Half what was Reported by even The Soviet Union.
The Soviet Union was already Notorious for Inflating Casualties it Attributed to the Enemy/Oppressed, and for Downplaying or Wholly Denying its many Sins.
America is one to talk; it had already Democided both Whites and Blacks in The South, on the Pretense of Liberating the latter. Its "Reconstructionism" has always been more Violence, Brainwashing and Thievery. The list goes on and on.
Only once all the Fratricidal Conflicts are all Publicly Admitted and Condemned will We have Progress Against "Progressivism"; only once those Ethnicities have Returned to a Culture that is Beneficial to Our Cause may they be Forgiven, though Individuals and Sub-Groups may Return before the Masses thereof, but it is Madness to War with your Brethren whom should now be your Allies because of an Injustice they are Ready and Willing to do all that is Humanly Possible to Correct.
Wednesday, December 31, 2014
Considerations on American and Finnish Socio-Economic Models
There has been talk about Finland's Low Child-Poverty, Surprisingly-Functional "Public" (Government) Educational System, and Low Crime-Rate. There's Speculation about why this is, but let's Consider it from a Different Angle than what you here from the "Progressive" and "Neo-Con" (Socialists, both):
90+% of Finland is either European or Europoid with some Mongoloid Admixture that have about the same Culture and have been there for almost as long (not as long in the Southern Portion, but perhaps longer in the Northern Portion), with the Largest Non-Europoid Minority being a Single-Digit Percent of Euro-Mongoloid Mixes with either a Mix of Phenotypes or only Mongoloid Appearance that are mostly Isolated in the Sparsely-Populated Northern Portion called "Lappland" (Literally: "Simpletonland"). I think that's most of it.
Now, let's Consider the Factors that are often Listed:
1 Year Paid Parental Leave actually sounds good to me; it's 1 Year of an Internship or Job for someone else (the Merits of the two otherwise being Equal, the one with the Highest Probability of having White Children while Employed should be Selected; if neither is more Likely than the other, then the Younger of the two should have it), and Encourages Bonding, Responsibility and further Reproduction among Parents.
Child Care would be Affordable to more People, if not for Unnecessary Taxation (something which Exists at an Opportunity Cost several times over; once in that you do not have Free Will over it, and then that Bureaucracy must Charge and Pay itself for this Inefficiency, once again Depriving you of Control over where this Stolen "Salary" goes) and there would be more Options or one would come to Dominate by Demonstrating its Merit (that is, as it is not Assisted by Tax-Dollars but rather Subject to Scrutiny).
I'd like to have a Clarification of the Context of "Basic Income For Minors", before I Agree or Challenge the Notion. An Allowance is really the Responsibility of the Parent(s), but a Minimum Allowance may be Practical under certain Conditions.
"Guaranteed Job For Everyone Under 25" does not sit well with me; if it was White-Specific and had an I.Q. Standard of at least Average, then I would Discuss Terms because I'm sure something that will Satisfy both Capitalists and Socialists could be herein Achieved. I have Modifications I would like to make to it, coming from a Capitalist Background and most Associated now with Physiocracy, but I Suggest that The Grand Charter of Fascism be Considered as a Template for whatever shall Evolve henceforth to Unite the many Factions of Our Cause.
The Idea of a Youth Council, whether a Chancellery, Congress or Parliament, has Intrigued me for Years; I was not Aware it actually Existed in Finland, until recently. Under the aforesaid Conditions, I would not find it Reckless; I would actually find it so if they were not Involved so Actively in The Political Process. I would like to Discuss with my Brothers and Sisters what Criteria there should be for it; I Suggest that while it should have Divisions Based On Age, each having to Meet a Resolution not only by a 2/3rd's Majority within its Membership, but with each of the other Branches by the same, the Vote of each Member and each Branch should be Equal. My Thought is that it will Protect the Younger from being Intimidated by those Older yet not Emotionally as Mature, and the Older from being Distracted by those Younger and not Emotionally as Mature; each has those whom Develop at Varying Rates, but Teenagers are Timid to be Compared to Children and Children are Eager to be seen as "Cool" by Teenagers, so each must Demonstrate to the other first what is Typical of their Age-Range and where Common Ground does Exist.
As for their Education System, let's first Dispel a Commonly-Cited Myth about why it is one of the World-Leaders: http://object.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/wp-content/uploads/Finland_Teachers_Doctors_Cato.jpg
Had that been True, it would have been Fiscally Irresponsible.
Now, there are things to be said of its Schooling that are Favourable; others might just be Different, and the Circumstances being a Determinant of Better or Worse:
It has a 5 (rather than 7) Hour-Long School Day wherein they do Less Work, and they also Rarely have Homework before they are in High School. Then, they have less. Well, that's just Logical.
Elementary School Students also have 75 Minutes of Recess, rather than America's Average of 27 Minutes; in Finland, you take a 15 Minute Break for Play every 45 Minutes of Class Time. Again, Logical.
Science Classes are Capped at 16 Pupils, so Practical Experiments may be Conducted in every Class. Logical.
43% of High Schools in Finland are Vocational. Logical. Someone tell the Japanese; They have a Problem with what They call "NEETs" (those Not in Education, Employment or Training). They've made some Improvements of Their own, though.
They don't even start School until they are 7.
They aren't even Graded for the first 6 Years of Schooling.
The National Curriculum is just a Broad Guideline to be Adjusted by the Teachers.
They Rarely have Examinations; the only Mandatory, Standardized Exam is taken at 16.
Overall, Their Test Scores Indicate this is a Preferable System to America's. Consider:
93% of Students in Finland will Graduate High School. Contrast that with a Record of 80% in America. That's not because of Improvements in Education; it's because of a General Decline in Curriculum, and "Affirmative Action" for Non-Whites that cannot otherwise Pass even with these Lowered Standards. Finland is doing something Better.
66% of Students in Finland go to College; the Highest Rate in Europe. By Contrast, only 65.9% of American High School Graduates went to College in 2013. It's High Point was only 70.1 in 2009. Granted, America's Student Loan-Bubble will Inevitably Burst and there is an Emergence of Vocational Training among the Intelligent. Unfortunately, America is also Teeming with "Affirmative Action" and other Parasitism.
Finland also Spends 30% Less Per Student than The U.S.A., to Achieve these Favourable Results; this is more Proof that American Teachers are Over-Paid for the Half-Year of "Educating".
The Difference between the Academically-Weakest and Strongest Students in Finland is the Lowest in the World; this is Primarily because of the Ethno-Cultural Factors, but also because Fast and Slow Learners are Taught in the same Classrooms as everyone else. If it weren't for the Positive Test Results and College Admittance Rates, this Academic Grouping would Concern me a Great Deal more. Still, this only Works for Finland because of its Demographics.
I Conjecture from a Combination of this and Personal Experience that Finland's Results are - apart from The Primary/Ethno-Cultural Factors - a Result of the Advanced not Feeling Pressured to Prove themselves while everyone else Learns from Friends whom are more Interesting to Learn from than the Adults. Some People just love Knowledge and will Learn on their own without the Stress; stop Bothering these People, and let them Play. Half the time, it's the same thing; Let Imaginations Thrive.
In the same Vein, I Suggest that Students be Offered a Choice of either "Gen-Ed" or "Specific Ed"; that could be for Advanced, Impaired or Average, by Results, but with Different Learning Styles and/or Preferences in Association/Dis-Association. Literally, for something to be "Special Ed", it must be Superior; it is Misused as a Euphemism for Inferior Education. While some Genuinely are Learning Impaired or even Learning Disabled, many are Learning Different; with the Proper Scenario, they Learn as well as or even Better than The Average Person.
One thing I did like from American Schools is when the Older Kids would come and be Reading Buddies with the Younger Kids; this should be Expanded upon, Greatly. Better Teachers in America will have Students Help each other. Student-Teachers should not just be someone fresh out of College waiting to get his or (Usually) her own Class. I'd like to see those Students whom Grasp the Content and can Relate it to the rest of the Class, actually Leading Lessons.
30% of Students in Finland have Extra Help in the first 9 Years of Schooling; this only Reinforces my Belief in Personalized Education for everyone.
In Finland, there's a Smaller Population than New York City but twice as many Teachers; each of these have a Master's Degree. Now, I do not put much Stock in Degrees; many Alledged "Experts" have been Horribly Mistaken or have Deliberately Promoted Falsehoods with these Degrees as all the Credence that The Masses would Require. That said, it would Limit the Number of those that Influence Our Children and We would sooner become Wary of such Mentalities and Merit-Less Over-Representation, if that's all to which We were Exposed.
On the Topic of Politics in General, here is a Graph about the Benefits of Private Gun-Ownership (with Hints as to Crime being Disproportionately Non-White):
http://uscrossfire.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/screen-shot-2013-03-12-at-4-02-42-pm.png
90+% of Finland is either European or Europoid with some Mongoloid Admixture that have about the same Culture and have been there for almost as long (not as long in the Southern Portion, but perhaps longer in the Northern Portion), with the Largest Non-Europoid Minority being a Single-Digit Percent of Euro-Mongoloid Mixes with either a Mix of Phenotypes or only Mongoloid Appearance that are mostly Isolated in the Sparsely-Populated Northern Portion called "Lappland" (Literally: "Simpletonland"). I think that's most of it.
Now, let's Consider the Factors that are often Listed:
1 Year Paid Parental Leave actually sounds good to me; it's 1 Year of an Internship or Job for someone else (the Merits of the two otherwise being Equal, the one with the Highest Probability of having White Children while Employed should be Selected; if neither is more Likely than the other, then the Younger of the two should have it), and Encourages Bonding, Responsibility and further Reproduction among Parents.
Child Care would be Affordable to more People, if not for Unnecessary Taxation (something which Exists at an Opportunity Cost several times over; once in that you do not have Free Will over it, and then that Bureaucracy must Charge and Pay itself for this Inefficiency, once again Depriving you of Control over where this Stolen "Salary" goes) and there would be more Options or one would come to Dominate by Demonstrating its Merit (that is, as it is not Assisted by Tax-Dollars but rather Subject to Scrutiny).
I'd like to have a Clarification of the Context of "Basic Income For Minors", before I Agree or Challenge the Notion. An Allowance is really the Responsibility of the Parent(s), but a Minimum Allowance may be Practical under certain Conditions.
"Guaranteed Job For Everyone Under 25" does not sit well with me; if it was White-Specific and had an I.Q. Standard of at least Average, then I would Discuss Terms because I'm sure something that will Satisfy both Capitalists and Socialists could be herein Achieved. I have Modifications I would like to make to it, coming from a Capitalist Background and most Associated now with Physiocracy, but I Suggest that The Grand Charter of Fascism be Considered as a Template for whatever shall Evolve henceforth to Unite the many Factions of Our Cause.
The Idea of a Youth Council, whether a Chancellery, Congress or Parliament, has Intrigued me for Years; I was not Aware it actually Existed in Finland, until recently. Under the aforesaid Conditions, I would not find it Reckless; I would actually find it so if they were not Involved so Actively in The Political Process. I would like to Discuss with my Brothers and Sisters what Criteria there should be for it; I Suggest that while it should have Divisions Based On Age, each having to Meet a Resolution not only by a 2/3rd's Majority within its Membership, but with each of the other Branches by the same, the Vote of each Member and each Branch should be Equal. My Thought is that it will Protect the Younger from being Intimidated by those Older yet not Emotionally as Mature, and the Older from being Distracted by those Younger and not Emotionally as Mature; each has those whom Develop at Varying Rates, but Teenagers are Timid to be Compared to Children and Children are Eager to be seen as "Cool" by Teenagers, so each must Demonstrate to the other first what is Typical of their Age-Range and where Common Ground does Exist.
As for their Education System, let's first Dispel a Commonly-Cited Myth about why it is one of the World-Leaders: http://object.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/wp-content/uploads/Finland_Teachers_Doctors_Cato.jpg
Had that been True, it would have been Fiscally Irresponsible.
Now, there are things to be said of its Schooling that are Favourable; others might just be Different, and the Circumstances being a Determinant of Better or Worse:
It has a 5 (rather than 7) Hour-Long School Day wherein they do Less Work, and they also Rarely have Homework before they are in High School. Then, they have less. Well, that's just Logical.
Elementary School Students also have 75 Minutes of Recess, rather than America's Average of 27 Minutes; in Finland, you take a 15 Minute Break for Play every 45 Minutes of Class Time. Again, Logical.
Science Classes are Capped at 16 Pupils, so Practical Experiments may be Conducted in every Class. Logical.
43% of High Schools in Finland are Vocational. Logical. Someone tell the Japanese; They have a Problem with what They call "NEETs" (those Not in Education, Employment or Training). They've made some Improvements of Their own, though.
They don't even start School until they are 7.
They aren't even Graded for the first 6 Years of Schooling.
The National Curriculum is just a Broad Guideline to be Adjusted by the Teachers.
They Rarely have Examinations; the only Mandatory, Standardized Exam is taken at 16.
Overall, Their Test Scores Indicate this is a Preferable System to America's. Consider:
93% of Students in Finland will Graduate High School. Contrast that with a Record of 80% in America. That's not because of Improvements in Education; it's because of a General Decline in Curriculum, and "Affirmative Action" for Non-Whites that cannot otherwise Pass even with these Lowered Standards. Finland is doing something Better.
66% of Students in Finland go to College; the Highest Rate in Europe. By Contrast, only 65.9% of American High School Graduates went to College in 2013. It's High Point was only 70.1 in 2009. Granted, America's Student Loan-Bubble will Inevitably Burst and there is an Emergence of Vocational Training among the Intelligent. Unfortunately, America is also Teeming with "Affirmative Action" and other Parasitism.
Finland also Spends 30% Less Per Student than The U.S.A., to Achieve these Favourable Results; this is more Proof that American Teachers are Over-Paid for the Half-Year of "Educating".
The Difference between the Academically-Weakest and Strongest Students in Finland is the Lowest in the World; this is Primarily because of the Ethno-Cultural Factors, but also because Fast and Slow Learners are Taught in the same Classrooms as everyone else. If it weren't for the Positive Test Results and College Admittance Rates, this Academic Grouping would Concern me a Great Deal more. Still, this only Works for Finland because of its Demographics.
I Conjecture from a Combination of this and Personal Experience that Finland's Results are - apart from The Primary/Ethno-Cultural Factors - a Result of the Advanced not Feeling Pressured to Prove themselves while everyone else Learns from Friends whom are more Interesting to Learn from than the Adults. Some People just love Knowledge and will Learn on their own without the Stress; stop Bothering these People, and let them Play. Half the time, it's the same thing; Let Imaginations Thrive.
In the same Vein, I Suggest that Students be Offered a Choice of either "Gen-Ed" or "Specific Ed"; that could be for Advanced, Impaired or Average, by Results, but with Different Learning Styles and/or Preferences in Association/Dis-Association. Literally, for something to be "Special Ed", it must be Superior; it is Misused as a Euphemism for Inferior Education. While some Genuinely are Learning Impaired or even Learning Disabled, many are Learning Different; with the Proper Scenario, they Learn as well as or even Better than The Average Person.
One thing I did like from American Schools is when the Older Kids would come and be Reading Buddies with the Younger Kids; this should be Expanded upon, Greatly. Better Teachers in America will have Students Help each other. Student-Teachers should not just be someone fresh out of College waiting to get his or (Usually) her own Class. I'd like to see those Students whom Grasp the Content and can Relate it to the rest of the Class, actually Leading Lessons.
30% of Students in Finland have Extra Help in the first 9 Years of Schooling; this only Reinforces my Belief in Personalized Education for everyone.
In Finland, there's a Smaller Population than New York City but twice as many Teachers; each of these have a Master's Degree. Now, I do not put much Stock in Degrees; many Alledged "Experts" have been Horribly Mistaken or have Deliberately Promoted Falsehoods with these Degrees as all the Credence that The Masses would Require. That said, it would Limit the Number of those that Influence Our Children and We would sooner become Wary of such Mentalities and Merit-Less Over-Representation, if that's all to which We were Exposed.
On the Topic of Politics in General, here is a Graph about the Benefits of Private Gun-Ownership (with Hints as to Crime being Disproportionately Non-White):
http://uscrossfire.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/screen-shot-2013-03-12-at-4-02-42-pm.png
Tuesday, December 30, 2014
On J.W.B., The C.S.A., and Motivations of Men
His 1/8th Jewish Blood has made me wonder if The Knights of the Golden Circle, not Heeding the Advice of Vice President John Caldwell Calhoun, who is - in my Mind - The Greatest American, were not (if not in Founding, in later Contraction) a False Flag by a Shadow Government more Concerned with "Reconstructionism" than Lincoln; the same as was done with Communist Lee Harvey Oswald being Permitted to Return from The Soviet Union for the Assassination of John Fitzgerald Kennedy, thus Enabling "Integration".
After all, K.G.C. Member and Master Mason Albert Pike was Expelled from The Invisible Empire by General Nathan Bedford Forrest; even Disbanding The Ku Klux Klan, altogether, because this Organization - Founded as a Fraternity of White Christians of any Ethnicity and Denomination - was so Infiltrated by Jews and Free Masons.
Freemasonry is not Scottish, albeit its First Lodge was in Scotland. The Jacobite Symbolism of The Klan is, itself, a Testament to the Irony of Masonic Membership in this Institution; the Jacobites were mostly Catholic, though some Protestants were Members for Dynastic Reasons, and Catholicism Forbids Masonic Membership. Unfortunately, Novus Ordo Katholicism is - itself - a Masonic Construct.
Booth's Actions, I am Convinced, were Perpetrated only because there was the Anticipation of Apathy; had there ever been more than a Shadow of the Fear of a White Uprising not Controlled on both of the Nominal Sides, he would never have made it through the door. Consider the following:
A Spanish Historian once Questioned why The South never did Rise Again; he looked to his own People having Resisted Moors, and the Slavics having Resisted Turkish, and Wondered why The Southron was so Complacent with his Subjugation. Why had he Rebelled at all?
The Problem is that most did not Realize this was a Racial War, so most did not Realize that the Gaelic, Hispanic, French, English, German and Prussian Cultures that must be together Embraced for the Formation of a Southron Culture would be Eviscerated.
If these Ethnicities did not have a Distinct Culture, then those Opposed to these Peoples and their Cultures would Argue that it was Acceptable that these Peoples and their Cultures be Destroyed; that Measures were taken to Break Peoples of their Cultures would be Denied, Declared Irrelevant or even Exalted as a Positive. If a Southron Ethnicity and/or Culture were to Emerge from the Confluence of these European Ethnicities, it would be Denied, Declared an Irrelevancy or even Demonized that there Exists a European Race. The Stronger the Ethno-Cultural Bonds, however, the more a Population or Allegiance of Populations will Resist such Absurdities.
To many, this was a War about Unfair Taxation and Protecting their Business Deals with the Governments in Europe. This Included the very Government that America had Seceded from; a Government which Oppressed many of the Ethnicities and Cultures of The South, and one which Warred with other European Ethnicities and Cultures.
"How is that my concern?", "How does that make me rich?", "Why should I care?" These Defectives are Murdering Us even more Effectively than the Non-Whites; it is for the Traitor that the Non-White is Able to do what it does so Effectively, if not altogether. When Traitors Get Their Comeuppance, They Blame Us. And thusly it Continues.
To Ensure this Remains so, the Jew and its Minions have Infiltrated Nationalist Movements; it becomes about Unsustainable Forms of Imperialism and Material Profit; it becomes about an Individualism that Relies upon the Collective to Provide for it and be its Scapegoat, and a Collectivism of such Undeserved Slavery and Torture.
We see this with Zionism in "The E.D.L.", "Front National" and "Right Sector" most of all, and with the Anti-Irish "B.N.P." The Secessionist Movements across Europe are almost all Liberal or (Openly) Communist. To be for the Survival of every Ethnicity of Our Race and the Practice of Cultures of European Composition thereby, is - in an Alienist Mindset - an Unpardonable Sin.
Monday, December 8, 2014
Khazaria: The Jewish Atlantis
In Addition to the Primary Motive of White Genocide, and the Secondary Motives that Deal with Strategic Positioning and Resources, one Motive in the Ukraine/Crimea Conflict is to Promote the False Notion of Jews as "White Khazars" by Reestablishing that Khaganate (though it never Controlled all of that Region, save if you Count Bolshevism).
Ironically, apart from not being the only Source of Jewish Blood, as Applies to all of Jewry, the Khazars were not White; rather, an Arabo-Mongoloid Horde. That is to say, the Chanaanite and Cinite Bloodlines via Esau-Edom were Maintained; new Admixture simply took place, as it Continues to with the Unwise and Raped.
Khavar a.k.a. Kabar would become Breakaways because of the Refusal to Adopt "Judaism" (more-Accurately called "Jewism"; "Jew" is a Misnomer for all Dwelling in Judea, as not all Dwelling in Judea are Judean nor otherwise Semite!); instead Reviving the Dead Cult of Mithraism (the "Parallels to Christianity" are Recent-Additions) and Uniting with other Mongrel Pagans.
This may very well have been Planned by The Jewish Elite, to Protect its Nominal Status as an Ally of The Byzantine Empire while Unleashing Hordes to Attack more of Europe; as with Jews before and as with Jews today, the Khazars - having Mass Converted to "Judaism" in 740 A.D. - were Playing Both Sides of (then Increasingly-Christian) European and (then Increasingly-Islamic) Arabic Conflicts. Since Biblical Times, Jewry has Established Controlled-Opposition and had a Persecution Complex.
The Modern Jew is an Armenoid Type, as are Syrians, Lebanese (Genetically-Indistinguishable between Jews and Arabs thereof) and some other Arabo-Turkish, and the Armenians have (amongst others) Iranic Blood. The latter, at least, is found throughout Central Asia; with the Exceptions of the Kazakh being mostly a 50/50 European-Mongoloid Mix, and European Recolonization.
Georgians don't like to Admit it, but They have Common Iranic Ancestry with Armenians. The Bats, Abkhazians, Dagestani, Chuvash, Ingush, Tajik and any other Georgians have been Proven by Genetic Testing to have Common/Turkish Ancestry. Khazaria's Capital was in Georgia.
"Kagan", "Khaghan", "Khagan" and "Kaghan" are all Turkish Variants of Mongol "Khan", and these are Common Names of Jews and other Arabs. Apart from Khazaria, though, this can be from the likes of Tamer/Tamur/Tamir The Lame a.k.a. Tamerlane being Islamic Mongol Turks. Mongols also Conquered Baghdad, for another Example of these Interactions, and there were the Kushans going through Bactria to The Indian Subcontinent, as well as "White Huns" (White-Mongoloid Mix) that would later Mix with both a Variety of Turkish and Whites in Europe.
As for the other Jewish Blood: Much of it had already Invaded throughout at least much of Europe, having fond such Favour among Pagan Empires that They would Accept Jewry even after The "Judeo"-Romanic Wars that The European Christ Prophesied. They mostly went to Spain, and so Proclaimed Themselves to be "Sephardi" [(Fakes of) Spaniards and Portuguese].
Christians, Fortunately, had and would Continue to Spread The Truth about Jewish Evil far and wide. It is thought it was this Manifestation of Anti-Christ Jewry that St. Patrick was Driving-Out, in his Sermon that Banished Snakes From Ireland. Remember: He was even Successful in Converting Druid Priests to Christianity, and Jewry has always been Compared to a Serpent.
The Fall of Khazaria was in 990 A.D. Between then and 994 A.D., this Manifestation of Jewry was in Central Europe; it Proclaimed itself "Ashkenazim" [Germanic (Ashkenaz was thought to be the Patriarch of Germanics)], and Created Yiddish. Yiddish is Their Corruption of High German with the (Nimrodian) Babylonianized Hebraic that was Created by the aforementioned Jews, as well as also Incorporating/Defiling Greek, Latin and several Baltic and Slavic Languages, with Turkish Influences.
One Mongrel, often Illiterate, at least outside of its own Language, itself a Mamzerization of others, albeit Unjustly in a Host Nation's Realms, with a Penchant for Deception, Lustful and with a Gluttony for Power, then Met another that did the same.
As each has those Accursed Biblical Bloodlines, though some more Homogeneous than others, though Inbreeding has such Odd Effects, as does Miscegenation, what Difference would the one Perceive in the other that would not be Ignored for Jewish Unity? Look at how the "Sephardi" and "Ashkenazim" are with each other - yet how United Against Us!
Through the Predominance of Jewry now being under another Name, whether Pretending to be White or not, and the rest Marrying between Admixture, during Their Migrations, as Tribes, Clans or Individuals, these two Self-Identifying Jewish Nations would "Assimilate" one another. This would Birth the so-called "Ashkenazim" and the so-called "Sephardim" of today; Typified as (Sub-)Europoid and (more-Evidently) Arabic, though some Overlap of Mongrels is to be Expected.
Either can Display Mongoloid Traits in a Mix with other Traits, but those that Appear just Mongoloid or a White-Mongoloid Mix are among those Types called "Ashkenazim". It is not Uncommon, however, for "Ashkenazim" to have some Negroid Traits.
The so-called "Romaniote Jews" are Allegedly the only ones without Khazar Ancestry. Whether or not True, these are still not Israelites; instead, these Pseudo-Romans are just another (Sub-)Europoid Form of Arabic.
Ironically, apart from not being the only Source of Jewish Blood, as Applies to all of Jewry, the Khazars were not White; rather, an Arabo-Mongoloid Horde. That is to say, the Chanaanite and Cinite Bloodlines via Esau-Edom were Maintained; new Admixture simply took place, as it Continues to with the Unwise and Raped.
Khavar a.k.a. Kabar would become Breakaways because of the Refusal to Adopt "Judaism" (more-Accurately called "Jewism"; "Jew" is a Misnomer for all Dwelling in Judea, as not all Dwelling in Judea are Judean nor otherwise Semite!); instead Reviving the Dead Cult of Mithraism (the "Parallels to Christianity" are Recent-Additions) and Uniting with other Mongrel Pagans.
This may very well have been Planned by The Jewish Elite, to Protect its Nominal Status as an Ally of The Byzantine Empire while Unleashing Hordes to Attack more of Europe; as with Jews before and as with Jews today, the Khazars - having Mass Converted to "Judaism" in 740 A.D. - were Playing Both Sides of (then Increasingly-Christian) European and (then Increasingly-Islamic) Arabic Conflicts. Since Biblical Times, Jewry has Established Controlled-Opposition and had a Persecution Complex.
The Modern Jew is an Armenoid Type, as are Syrians, Lebanese (Genetically-Indistinguishable between Jews and Arabs thereof) and some other Arabo-Turkish, and the Armenians have (amongst others) Iranic Blood. The latter, at least, is found throughout Central Asia; with the Exceptions of the Kazakh being mostly a 50/50 European-Mongoloid Mix, and European Recolonization.
Georgians don't like to Admit it, but They have Common Iranic Ancestry with Armenians. The Bats, Abkhazians, Dagestani, Chuvash, Ingush, Tajik and any other Georgians have been Proven by Genetic Testing to have Common/Turkish Ancestry. Khazaria's Capital was in Georgia.
"Kagan", "Khaghan", "Khagan" and "Kaghan" are all Turkish Variants of Mongol "Khan", and these are Common Names of Jews and other Arabs. Apart from Khazaria, though, this can be from the likes of Tamer/Tamur/Tamir The Lame a.k.a. Tamerlane being Islamic Mongol Turks. Mongols also Conquered Baghdad, for another Example of these Interactions, and there were the Kushans going through Bactria to The Indian Subcontinent, as well as "White Huns" (White-Mongoloid Mix) that would later Mix with both a Variety of Turkish and Whites in Europe.
As for the other Jewish Blood: Much of it had already Invaded throughout at least much of Europe, having fond such Favour among Pagan Empires that They would Accept Jewry even after The "Judeo"-Romanic Wars that The European Christ Prophesied. They mostly went to Spain, and so Proclaimed Themselves to be "Sephardi" [(Fakes of) Spaniards and Portuguese].
Christians, Fortunately, had and would Continue to Spread The Truth about Jewish Evil far and wide. It is thought it was this Manifestation of Anti-Christ Jewry that St. Patrick was Driving-Out, in his Sermon that Banished Snakes From Ireland. Remember: He was even Successful in Converting Druid Priests to Christianity, and Jewry has always been Compared to a Serpent.
The Fall of Khazaria was in 990 A.D. Between then and 994 A.D., this Manifestation of Jewry was in Central Europe; it Proclaimed itself "Ashkenazim" [Germanic (Ashkenaz was thought to be the Patriarch of Germanics)], and Created Yiddish. Yiddish is Their Corruption of High German with the (Nimrodian) Babylonianized Hebraic that was Created by the aforementioned Jews, as well as also Incorporating/Defiling Greek, Latin and several Baltic and Slavic Languages, with Turkish Influences.
One Mongrel, often Illiterate, at least outside of its own Language, itself a Mamzerization of others, albeit Unjustly in a Host Nation's Realms, with a Penchant for Deception, Lustful and with a Gluttony for Power, then Met another that did the same.
As each has those Accursed Biblical Bloodlines, though some more Homogeneous than others, though Inbreeding has such Odd Effects, as does Miscegenation, what Difference would the one Perceive in the other that would not be Ignored for Jewish Unity? Look at how the "Sephardi" and "Ashkenazim" are with each other - yet how United Against Us!
Through the Predominance of Jewry now being under another Name, whether Pretending to be White or not, and the rest Marrying between Admixture, during Their Migrations, as Tribes, Clans or Individuals, these two Self-Identifying Jewish Nations would "Assimilate" one another. This would Birth the so-called "Ashkenazim" and the so-called "Sephardim" of today; Typified as (Sub-)Europoid and (more-Evidently) Arabic, though some Overlap of Mongrels is to be Expected.
Either can Display Mongoloid Traits in a Mix with other Traits, but those that Appear just Mongoloid or a White-Mongoloid Mix are among those Types called "Ashkenazim". It is not Uncommon, however, for "Ashkenazim" to have some Negroid Traits.
The so-called "Romaniote Jews" are Allegedly the only ones without Khazar Ancestry. Whether or not True, these are still not Israelites; instead, these Pseudo-Romans are just another (Sub-)Europoid Form of Arabic.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)